Skip to main content

Study methods at a glance

This site explains what we studied, which data we used, how we constructed the analytic populations, why each statistical method was selected, and how to reproduce the aggregate review analysis.

The central question​

Among Chicago census tracts with usable 2022–2024 Chicago Health Map data, do direct tract-level EHR-diagnosed proportions retain geographic information that is not conveyed by a direct community-area label for the same condition and period?

The study evaluates geographic resolution, not whether Chicago Health Map is a substitute for population surveillance. Chicago Health Map describes diagnoses recorded among adults observed in participating CAPriCORN health systems. It does not estimate disease prevalence among all Chicago residents.

:::info The paper's scientific pitch

Health-system research data can supplement public-health surveillance by showing clinically recorded variation within larger reporting areas. The value is complementary. Population-based public-health data remain the basis for population inference.

:::

What we did​

  1. Audited source definitions, denominators, suppression, geography, and years.
  2. Defined a primary Chicago tract frame and condition-specific eligibility.
  3. Pooled annual EHR counts by summing numerators and denominators before division.
  4. Compared direct tract values with direct community-area labels.
  5. Quantified within-area heterogeneity, rank gaps, quartile disagreement, and movement into or out of the highest quartile.
  6. Used community-area cluster bootstrap intervals for dependence among tracts in the same area.
  7. Repeated the classification comparison with Census ZCTAs as a geographic sensitivity.
  8. Used CDC PLACES and Healthy Chicago Survey data for cross-source triangulation, not validation.
  9. Examined supplementary ecological life-expectancy and spatial models.
  10. Preserved all inputs and outputs through SHA-256 checksums and deterministic notebook builds.

Main analysis boundary​

ComponentFinal role
Tract versus community-area comparisonPrimary geographic-resolution analysis
Tract versus ZCTA comparisonPrespecified geographic sensitivity
CDC PLACES concordanceSecondary cross-source context
Healthy Chicago Survey hypertensionSecondary community-area triangulation
Area-label AUCExploratory separation measure
Life-expectancy and spatial modelsSupplementary ecological analyses
Combined diabetesExcluded because mutual exclusivity and denominator equivalence were not documented
2025 holdout and external networkPrespecified future replication analyses

Use the navigation at left for the complete data and statistical specification.